Eastbourne councillors clash over long-awaited audit

Eastbourne Town Hall SUS-210216-141547001Eastbourne Town Hall SUS-210216-141547001
Eastbourne Town Hall SUS-210216-141547001
Eastbourne councillors have clashed over the contents of a long-awaited financial report. 

Last month, Eastbourne Borough Council finally received its external audit report for the 2018/19 financial year after a delay of several years.

According to the external auditor Deloitte, the delay had primarily been due to uncertainty around a transaction involving the council-owned Investment Company Eastbourne (ICE) and a property in Leicester.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

As part of this, ICE is acting as the principal guarantor of a £48m refinancing loan to a private company, with the council being the ultimate guarantor. ICE is also providing a rental guarantee in respect of shortfalls of rental income, again with the council being the ultimate guarantor. 

Kshama ShoreKshama Shore
Kshama Shore

The circumstances of the transaction had been identified as a ‘significant risk’ by Deloitte, meaning it required special consideration as part of the firm’s audit work. 

While Deloitte did not end up withholding a full value for money opinion as a result of the transaction it did highlight a number of “areas for improvement”.

These included ensuring clarity of the accounting and budgetary impact ahead of entering into  such a transaction, ensuring clear consideration of downside risks, and transparent consideration of changes in transactions from initial approvals.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

It also required that a £2m payment the council received for acting as the guarantor be spread over several years, resulting in a change to  the final reported reserves for 2018/19.

David TuttDavid Tutt
David Tutt

The report said: “Following review of documentation and interviews with management, as well as review of the report of internal audit on the governance of the transaction, we concluded that it is not necessary to include an exception to our value for money conclusion in respect of this matter.

“We note that the final contractual structure entered into in 2018 was not the same as that initially consulted on and approved by council in 2017, and would view it as good practice for a major transaction for the updated transaction structure to have been reported.

“We have identified other control recommendations in respect of complex transactions in our findings.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Deloitte’s findings have seen criticism leveled against the council’s Liberal Democrat leadership by its Conservative counterpart. 

Consevative councillor Kshama Shore said: “This Liberal Democrat-led council, either wilfully, or more likely, through ignorance, entered into the arrangement without understanding the detailed accounting implications for Eastbourne Borough Council.

“At the time of the audit, it became apparent that there was no clear audit trail of the transaction.

“Furthermore, the final contractual structure entered into in 2018 was not the same as that initially consulted on and approved by council in 2017.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“Unless the governing party fully understands the balance of risk and reward, how can we be satisfied that there is strong governance? Due diligence was carried out, but did the governing party understand it? Where were the internal warning systems?

“Why was it that in a quarterly report from our internal auditors in March 2021 only one out of 23 audits received full assurance, even the main accounting system did not get the full assurance, this is a disgrace.”

Conservatives also criticised the council over its financial transparency and the long delay to the external audit. The party also argued the investment was like ‘playing Russian roulette’ given the council’s level of reserves.

However, Cllr Shore’s comments came in for some criticism from Liberal Democrat council leader David Tutt.